Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53589

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : July | Volume : 17 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC37 - EC41 Full Version

Histomorphological Spectrum of Adnexal Tumours of the Skin: A Descriptive Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in Karnataka, India


Published: July 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64172.18213
Apoorva Pandit, MS Siddegowda, Y Muralidhar Bhat, Chaithanya Krishnappa

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Chaithanya Krishnappa,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya-571401, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: chaithanya.krishnappa@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Skin Adnexal Tumours (SAT) are a category of rare and most uncommon tumours. They could display multiple lines of differentiation such as follicular, eccrine, apocrine, sebaceous, and sometimes mixed differentiation, generating a mistaken diagnosis that might lead to unwarranted and unnecessary interventions.

Aim: To describe the types and microscopic features of adnexal tumours.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective study on SAT received for histopathology at the Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India, from January 2018 to June 2022 during the study period of September 2022 to March 2023. The records of patients including age, gender and site were retrieved from the registers maintained at the department and Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained slides were examined and the data was analysed by descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 62 cases were included in the study out of which, 59 (95.2%) cases were found to be benign and 3 (4.8%) cases were malignant. The mean age was found to be 43.87 years. A total of 28 (45.1%) cases were seen in the age group of 21 to 40 years. Females outnumbered the males with 32 cases (51.6%). A maximum number of cases belonged to the group of sweat gland tumours (29/62, 46.8%) followed by hair follicle tumours (21/62, 33.9%) and sebaceous gland tumours (12/62, 19.3%). Nodular hidradenoma was the commonest sweat gland tumour (12/29, 41.4%), pilomatricoma was the commonest hair follicle tumour (10/21, 47.6%) and sebaceous adenoma was the commonest sebaceous gland tumour (10/12, 83.3%). The most common malignancy was sebaceous carcinoma (2/3, 66.67%) in females. The male-to-female ratio was found to be 1:1.06.

Conclusion: The incidence of SAT was low with the majority being benign tumours. Malignant tumours are even rarer and are often mistaken for cutaneous epithelial malignancies. These lesions may prompt the clinician towards unwanted surgery or treatment for the patient. They exhibit a wide variety of morphological patterns which may be confused for primary from other sites. In such cases, histopathological examination becomes necessary. Hence, a combination of good clinical expertise and histopathological confirmation by the Pathologist helps appropriately to manage the patient.

Keywords

Biopsy, Nodular hidradenoma, Pilomatricoma, Sebaceous adenoma, Sebaceous carcinoma

The largest sensory organ of human body is the skin, which accounts for about 15% of total body weight. It is a complex organ having multiple functions. Primarily, it acts as a barrier against various harmful environmental agents (1). Adnexae are structures present within the skin that aide in its function. They are represented by three histologically distinct structures: (a) the pilosebaceous unit; (b) the eccrine sweat glands; and (c) the apocrine glands (2),(3). These tumours may express one or more lines of appendageal differentiation during neoplastic transformation as they arise from multipotent stem cells present within epidermis or its appendageal structures (4). Neoplastic lesions of the skin and adnexae are increasing over the past few decades (5). Diagnosing them as benign or malignant, poses a challenge for clinicians in many ways. Biopsy for histopathological examination is the gold standard method to arrive at a diagnosis. Treatment options often include surgery which cannot be performed unless there is a confirmed diagnosis.

The spectrum of SAT ranges from a benign tumour that can be excised completely to a malignant, aggressive tumour which can metastasise (6). Many of these tumours are associated with hereditary syndromes such as Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, Brooke-Spiegler syndrome, Cowden syndrome and Muir-Torre syndrome (7). Since non neoplastic skin lesions are much more common than adnexal tumours of skin, clinicians tend to misinterpret and misdiagnose adnexal tumours as other skin lesions. The present study aimed at histopathological analysis of the SAT in a tertiary care hospital to identify the characteristic features that help in identification of these specific tumours in various age groups, gender, anatomical location, types and microscopic features of adnexal tumours of skin and highlights the importance of the possibility of adnexal tumours among skin lesions.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care centre in Department of Pathology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. Data was collected from January 2018 to June 2022 and analysed from September 2022 to March 2023. The study was done after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), bearing the number MIMS/IEC/2022/678 and dated 27/10/2022.

Inclusion criteria: All cases of biopsy for adnexal tumours of skin received during the study period were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: All cases who were already under treatment for adnexal tumours of skin were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A total of 1,512 skin biopsies were received during the study period out of which 62 cases were diagnosed as adnexal tumours of skin.

Fixation of the excised specimens was done in 10% neutral buffered formalin. After tissue processing, 4 μ to 5 μ thick tissue sections were taken. The sections were stained using H&E stain. The slides were evaluated to arrive at a final diagnosis categorised according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, 4th edition published in 2018 (2). All cases of biopsy for adnexal tumour were retrieved from histopathology registers and reviewed. The findings were analysed using descriptive statistics. Since the study was a retrospective and descriptive study, the individual parameters were not comparable to obtain a statistical significance.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel, version 2014 and the results were expressed in percentage.

Results

A total of 62 patients underwent biopsy for SATs during the study period. Female patients outnumbered the males with 32 (51.6%)females and 30 (48.4%) males. The male to female ratio was 1:1.06. The adnexal tumours were distributed in various anatomical locations of the body with most common being the head and neck region (54.90%) cases followed by lower extremities (14.5%) (Table/Fig 1).

The mean age was found to be 43.87 years in the present study. The age group of 21-40 years had maximum number of cases (28, 45.1%) followed by 41-60 years (23, 37.1%). Among children and adolescents, sweat gland tumours were more common whereas in the age group of 21-40 years, sweat gland tumours and follicular tumours were seen equally. Among the age group of 41-60 years, sweat gland tumours were more common (Table/Fig 2).

Among females, nodular hidradenoma was the commonest SAT observed (21.8%) followed by 18.75% of trichoepithelioma and pilomatricoma. Among males, sebaceous adenoma was the commonest SAT (30%) followed by 16.7% of nodular hidradenoma (Table/Fig 3).

Among the adnexal tumours, 59 (95.2%) cases were found to be benign and 3 (4.8%) cases were malignant. Among the benign tumours, sweat gland tumours constituted the largest group with a total of 29 cases (46.8%) followed by hair follicle tumours (21/62; 33.9%) and sebaceous gland tumours (12/62; 19.3%). Out of 29 sweat gland tumours, nodular hidradenoma was the commonest with 12 cases (41.4%) followed by five cases (17.3%) of chondroidsyringoma. Out of 21 hair follicular tumours, pilomatricoma was the commonest with 10 cases (47.6%) followed by nine cases (42.8%) of trichoepithelioma. Out of 12 sebaceous gland tumours, majority (83.5%) were sebaceous adenoma and two cases (16.7%) were sebaceous carcinoma (Table/Fig 4).

Histopathological Features

I. Tumours along sweat gland distribution: The total number of sweat gland tumours in the present study were 29.

a. Nodular hidradenoma: This particular lesion is characterised by multiple lobules within the dermis comprising of epithelial cells arranged as tubules of varying sizes separated by fibrovascular septa lined by cuboidal to columnar secretory cells. The cells were round to polyhedral with a central round nucleus and eosinophilic to clear cytoplasm. The present study had 12 cases (41.4%) (Table/Fig 5)a.
b. Chondroidsyringoma: This tumour shows tadpole shaped ducts lined by bilayered cuboidal epithelium embedded within a myxoidstroma. The present study had 5 (17.3%) cases (Table/Fig 5)b.
c. Eccrineporoma: It shows islands of basaloid epithelial cells with cytoplasmic clearing within a hyalinised stroma (Table/Fig 5)c. The current study had 4 (13.7%) cases.
d. Hidradenoma papiplliferum: A well circumscribed lesion characterised by tubular and cystic spaces lined by outer myoepithelial cells and inner cuboidal to columnar cells with decapitation secretion thrown into papillary folds (Table/Fig 5)d. The current study had 3 (10.3%) cases.
e. Syringocystadenoma papilliferum: This tumour shows cystic invaginations with papillary projections lined by columnar and cuboidal epithelium in two layers (Table/Fig 5)e. This study had 1 (3.5%) case.

II. Tumours along follicular distribution: The total number of hair follicular tumours in the present study were 21.

f. Pilomatricoma: This tumour shows islands of peripheral basaloid epithelial cells in sheets and abrupt keratinisation leading to formation of shadow cells towards the centre along with areas of calcification. The current study had 10 cases (47.6%) (Table/Fig 5)f.
g. Trichoepithelioma: This tumour showed islands of basaloid epithelial cells with cytoplasmic clearing arranged within hyalinised stroma as small islands with peripheral palisading of nuclei along with horn cysts (Table/Fig 5)g. The current study had 9 (42.8%) cases.
h. Proliferating trichilemmal tumour: This tumour shows proliferating stratified squamous epithelium that changes abruptly into eosinophilic amorphous keratin (trichilemmal keratinisation) and areas of calcification (Table/Fig 5)h. The current study had 1 (4.8%) case.

III. Tumours along sebaceous gland differentiation: The total number of sebaceous gland tumours in the present study were 12.

i. Sebaceous adenoma: This tumour is characterised by mature and immature sebaceous epithelial cells arranged in lobules within the dermis (Table/Fig 5)i. The current study had 10 cases (83.3%).
j. Sebaceous carcinoma: This malignant tumour is characterised by irregular lobules of variably atypical cells with multivacuolated cytoplasm and pleomorphic nucleus separated by fibrovascularstroma. Mitotic activity is variable (Table/Fig 5)j,k. The current study had 2 (6.7%) cases.

Discussion

Adnexal tumours are a category of rare tumours. Some adnexal tumours have extracutaneous counterparts (2). Most of the tumours can be identified only on microscopic examination. The incidence of SATs among all biopsies in the present study was found to be 4.1%. Sejekan SV and Biligi DS found the incidence to be 2.6% (8). The present study found 21-40 years to be commonest age group affected similar to the studies done by Pal S et al., and Gopidesi DT et al., who each found 31-40 years to be the commonest age group whereas Sudhakar G et al., found 51-60 years to be the commonest age group (9),(10),(11). The head and neck region was the most affected site in present study with (54.9%) which was similar to the studies done by Sejekan SV and Biligi DS, Pal S et al., Gopidesi DT et al., Sudhakar G et al., and Saleem R et al., who found 95%, 69%, 73.33%, 64% and 59.4%, respectively (8),(9),(10),(11),(12). Females outnumbered the males in the present study which was similar to Saleem R et al., who found 1:1.08 ratio (12). Studies done by Sejekan SV and Biligi DS, Pal S et al., Gopidesi DT et al., Sudhakar G et al., and Thakuria SK et al., found male preponderance with 1.14:1, 1.2:1, 1.2:1, 1:1.5 and 1.57:1 ratio, respectively (Table/Fig 6) (8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15).

In the present study, majority of the cases 59 (95.2%) cases were found to be benign and 3 (4.8%) cases were malignant. This was in concordance with the studies done by, Sejekan SV and Biligi DS, Pal S et al., and Sudhakar G et al., who found 94.22%, 94.3% and 95.5% of the tumours to be benign in nature whereas malignant tumours were seen in 5.78%, 5.7% and 4.5%, respectively (8),(9),(11). Present study observed that the tumours of sweat gland origin were the most common (46.7%). Nodular hidradenoma was the commonest neoplasm in this group with 12 cases (41.4%) in the current study. This was in concordance with the studies done by Sejekan SV and Biligi DS, Pal S et al., Gopidesi DT et al., Saleem R et al., Thakuria SK et al., and Nayak GD et al., who found 36.43%, 45%, 25.14%, 23.07% and 56.25% of nodular hidradenoma among sweat gland tumours, respectively (Table/Fig 7) (8),(9),(10),(12),(14),(16).

Among hair follicle tumours, the present study had 10 cases of pilomatricoma (47.6%) followed by nine cases of trichoepithelioma. Similar observations were made by Sejekan SV and Biligi DS, Pal S et al., Gopidesi DT et al., Saleem R et al., and Thakuria SK et al., who found 32.47%, 59.7%, 50%, 51.55%, and 50% of pilomatricoma among hair follicle tumours whereas Nayak GD et al., found proliferating trichilemmal tumour to be the commonest tumour (59%) (9),(10),(12),(14),(16). Among sebaceous neoplasms, the current study had 10 cases of sebaceous adenoma (83.34%). Similar observations were made by Gopidesi DT et al., and Saman F et al., with 50% of adenomas each (10),(13).

Among the malignant tumours, sebaceous carcinoma was most common (66.67%). This was similar to the study done by Gopidesi DT et al., Saman F et al., and Nayak GD et al., who found the sole malignancy to be sebaceous carcinoma (100%) (10),(13),(16). Sejekan SV and Biligi DS and Thakuria SK et al., found that sebaceous carcinoma was the commonest malignancy encountered with 83.34% and 75% (8),(14). Among 62 cases, clinical suspicion of SAT was found in 12 cases only (19.35%). Rest of the cases were thought to be non neoplastic skin disorders clinically. Both the cases of sebaceous carcinoma were thought to be epidermal malignancies on clinical examination and were diagnosed as malignant SAT only after histopathological examination. Moreover, they are rare tumours and their exact incidence is still unclear (15). The diagnosis of SATs is based mainly on histopathology and a strong clinical suspicion based on the site of the lesion. Ancillary techniques such as immunohistochemistry were of less importance in their diagnosis.

Limitation(s)

The number of malignancies in the present study were three cases. A higher number of cases with more varied diagnoses would have been beneficial. The data on clinical presentation of the tumours is not sufficient in the study owing to limited availability of the same.

Conclusion

Although skin lesions are frequently encountered but due to an overlap between the presentations of some adnexal tumours with other skin lesions, they are often misdiagnosed as non neoplastic. They are often encountered on sun exposed areas where they can be mistaken for cutaneous malignancies. The location of these lesions, a good thorough clinical examination, probability of the occurrence of these lesions and adequate knowledge of histopathological examination are helpful in diagnosing them accurately. The present study will help in improving the knowledge and awareness regarding the rare adnexal tumours of skin occurring in this region.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to acknowledge the support given by the Director, MIMS, Mandya and the Department of Pathology, MIMS, Mandya for conducting present study.

References

1.
Murphy GF, Lazar AJF. The Skin. In: Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Aster J, eds. Robbins & Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 8th Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010. Pp.1141-79. [crossref]
2.
International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, International Academy of Pathology. WHO classification of skin tumours. 4th ed. Elder DE, editor. IARC; 2018.
3.
Ahmed TS, Priore JD, Seykora JT. Tumours of epidermal appendages. In: Elder DE, ed. Lever’s Histopathology of Skin. 11th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2015:851-909.
4.
Alsaad KO, Obaidat NA, Ghazarian D. Skin adnexal neoplasms--part 1: An approach to tumours of the pilosebaceous unit. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60(2):129- 44. Doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.040337. Epub 2006 Aug 1. PMID: 16882696; PMCID: PMC1860623. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Samaila M, Adewuyi S. A histopathological analysis of cutaneous malignancies in a tropical population. Niger J Surg Res. 2006;7:300-04. [crossref]
6.
Jeyanthi G, Gopalakrishnan M, Thilagavathy NS, Shifa S, Kamaleshwari K. Histomorphological spectrum of skin adnexal tumours: A retrospective study in a tertiary care centre. Ann App Biosci. 2016;3(3):A233-40.
7.
Danialan R, Mutyambizi K, Aung PP, Prieto VG, Ivan D. Challenges in the diagnosis of cutaneous adnexal tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68(12):992-1002. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sejekan SV, Biligi DS. Clinicopathological study of skin adnexal tumours with special emphasis on the line of differentiation. J Med Sci Health. 2022;8(1):08-13. [crossref]
9.
Pal S, Mondal T, Jamadar NS, Mondal S. Clinico-pathological study of skin adnexal tumour-A retrospective review of 242 cases from a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Health Clin Res. 2021;4:76-79.
10.
Gopidesi DT, Sai PV, Vissa S, Bandla S, Charan BVH, Rao NM, et al. Skin adnexal tumours: A histopathological analysis of 30 cases at a tertiary care centre. Saudi J Pathol Microbiol [Internet]. 2020;05(02):67-71. [crossref]
11.
Sudhakar G, Murthy BK, Prasanna BP, Suneetha K. Skin adnexal tumors: A clinicopathological study. United Kingdom: Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2022;09:3715-19.
12.
Saleem R, Chughtai A, Zafar A, Zafar G, Lone UM, Chughtai A. Clinicopathological spectrum of benign Skin adnexal tumours in the Pakistani population: A single-center study. Cureus [Internet]. 2023;15(3):e35753. [crossref]
13.
Saman F, Sarfraz S, Arshad M, Niazi S, Ahmed R. Histopathological spectrum of skin adnexal neoplasms at Mayo Hospital, Lahore. Pakistan Postgraduate Med J. 2020;31(01):24-28. [crossref]
14.
Thakuria SK, Deka MK, Das A, Phukan A, Khakhlari NM. A two years study of histopathological spectrum of skin adnexal tumours in a tertiary care centre of Southern Assam, India. Int J Res Med Sci [Internet]. 2020;8(5):1802-07. [crossref]
15.
Omar AM, Natag O. Four years retrospective study of skin adnexal tumours: Histomorphology and special stain study. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2020;9:273-79. [crossref]
16.
Nayak GD, Raman S, Rath J, Dash KL, Senapati U. Clinico-pathological study of skin adnexal tumours in a tertiary care hospital. IP Arch Cytology Histopathol Res. 2020;5:224-28.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64172.18213

Date of Submission: Mar 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Apr 27, 2023
Date of Acceptance: May 30, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 27, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 28, 2023
• iThenticate Software: May 25, 2023 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com